Tuesday, May 09, 2017

Review: Life After Heaven by Steven Musick


Review: Life After Heaven by Steven Musick (with Paul J Pastor)
How My Time in Heaven Can Transform Your Life on Earth
  • Paperback: 208 pages
  • Publisher: WaterBrook (March 7, 2017)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1601429886
  • ISBN-13: 978-1601429889

I liked this book a lot. Not because it's about near-death-experiences, though. I've read so many near-death experiences books and Jesus encounter stories that, while I love them and they do feed my faith, I'm not generally surprised by them any more. Jesus is always sweet, powerful, with beautiful eyes, and supernaturally good. Which of course, He should be because He is our savior. But after a while, it's the same old thing. So one needs to read these books for something other the recounting of the experience.

In this case, this book's uniqueness is it's depiction of a sick person who endured a long sickness until he was healed. That is what really blessed me in this book. I like any book which shows that someone can be healed even after a long illness.

Not all of us can endure long illnesses in a fairly good mood. This author managed. And, although many sick Christians wish to die in order to live with Jesus in heaven, Steven Musick endured life even though he wanted to die because he had already seen Jesus in heaven.

I won't say how he became sick. But after his illness, he died. Jesus met him and Jesus is "okay" and all the bad things in Musick's life was made "okay" or blessed into okayness by a super-understanding and super-loving Jesus. (yes, I kinda wish the author didn't use the word "okay" to describe the healing presence of Jesus when Jesus healed his soul. It just feels so touchy-feely. The book's a great book, an inspirational read but... that "okay" kinda made me cringe.)

Returning from heaven was difficult for Musick, but his experiences there continued to affect his life after he returned to his ill body. The love, power, and acceptance he saw when he walked with Jesus made him realize that heaven is always with us. The kingdom of God is everpresent and wishing to touch and overflow in our life on earth. There are few books that convey what the kingdom of God is as well as this book. In fact, there are very few books which actually try to show what the gospel of the kingdom is. This book does a good job.

 I recommend this book highly. I received this book free and without charge in exchange for a fair and honest review.

Review: Practicing the Power by Sam Storms


Practicing the Power -- Welcoming the gifts of the Holy Spirit in Your
by Sam Storms
  • Paperback: 272 pages
  • Publisher: Zondervan (February 7, 2017)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0310533848
  • ISBN-13: 978-0310533849

I liked this book a lot. It makes you feel: This is what a church should be like, this is what pastors should be teaching their congregation -- the riches of God's grace and the power of God in us who believe.

If you're a Charismatic Christian, you've probably read tons of books on the gifts of the spirit. Usually these books are about the book author's journey and they are often limited to one gift of the spirit. So we have prophets writing books on prophecy, dreamers writing books on dreaming,  healers writing books on healing. Those books are all needed because those topics are pretty deep. But there are few books which can be used either for individual study, pastoral study, small groups, or larger communal church groups. This is one of them.

The challenge for anyone --especially a pastor-- who would want to actually practice the Biblically-based counsel in this book is that the church habits, services, and traditions would have to change a little to accommodate them. This means pastors might have to give up their desire to be the main "minister" to the congregation and become more of the one who trains, guides, and orchestrates all members of the church to minister to each other.

For instance, churches that only have the pastor pray for the sick, might have to give up some of their specialness (let's face it, many pastors like being the be-all and end-all and source and like running their little fiefs) and A) be Biblical in letting the elders/deacons pray for the sick and those who have shown that they have some gifts for healing. Although this isn't a book that teaches all aspects of healing (even deliverance is included) or prophesy or all aspects of any of the gifts, its chapters guide the reader into how to practice the gifts decently and in order yet in a way where the Holy is actually present to work. 

This book will teach pastors and church members how to guide the prophets, workers of miracles, healers, faithers to develop, recognize, and use their gifts. It will also teach them how to understand how God wishes to work in each church and how each gift is to be used. How many of us have heard some so-called prophetess say something that is supposed to be a prophecy and felt uneasy about it? This book definitely shows the pitfalls of wrong prophets, prophesying, and prophesies. I especially liked the part where the author addresses how to use, understand, recognize spontaneous "spiritual songs" in the middle of the service. This is definitely the kind of book Paul might have given to the Corinthian church.

This book is definitely a challenge, but for those of us who want to be in a church that is as Biblical as possible it's a great book and an easy read. Who doesn't want to be in a church that does church the way God designed it
?
I was given this book free and without charge in exchange for a fair and honest review.
 

Wednesday, February 15, 2017

The Fan: Microcosm and Macrocosm -- Human Woundedness from A(lienated) to Z(ootopia)

 


Alienated 2016. Writer/Director: Brian Ackley. Producer: Brian Ackley, Princeton Holt, and Cassandra Riddick. Actors: Taylor Negron, George Katt, and Jen Burry. Streaming on Amazon Prime  


First thing first. Let me say that yes, there is an alien invasion in this film and in the long run it probably doesn’t really matter. Yep, that’s a spoiler but I kinda doubt if anyone who watches this movie will care about that -- after he reads my review. It’s a good flick -- or at least it was liked by yours truly. But do not go into this movie thinking we have a scifi movie on your hands.


Meet Paige who is married to  Nate. Conspiracy theorist, visionary, isolationist, artist, possibly self-involved, Nate has seen what he thinks is a spacecraft. Trouble is: Nate is trying to get Paige to understand and Paige is having none of it. These two are in a communication and marriage meltdown. Whether it’s because Paige doesn’t understand Nate’s artistic spirit or feels just plain jealous and slighted, it’s hard to tell. At least in the beginning. Sure, Nate includes h himself in all his paintings. The artist part of me can kinda understand that. The characters in my novels pretty much resemble me in parts. And don’t all artists basically do art about themselves? So yeah, I understand Nate a bit. But there’s also the other side. And if there is one thing about this movie it’s that there is always the other side -- a side which the viewer sees, but which the active participants in this marital breakdown are reluctant to see. The other side is this: Well, why the heck is is putting himself in all his pictures? Can’t he vary his drawing style a bit? Why is he putting himself in a painting which he is giving to Denise, the widow of his best friend? Yes, yes, I get it: he is showing her he identifies with loss. Or he is showing loss itself. But dangnabbit, if you sense that your wife is jealous of the woman...you might want to rethink that whole art project.  And really why are the lights on the spacecraft like the lights on your painting to Denise? Is there something you don’t know about yourself, Nate?


Why continue willfully on your own way if you sense the discussion is really about something else? And “sense” is the operative word here. One gets the feeling as one listens to this long painfully grievous conversation --yep! This entire film is a conversation-- that one needs to be willing to sense the other person’s side and that these folks are fully capable of willing themselves to….but they just have reached the point where they don’t want to will themselves to understand any more.


I swear this movie would be good for a marriage counseling class. Again, I repeat, the whole alien invasion thing has very little to do with the plot. It doesn’t mean the film is bad. It’s a very good, very harrowing, very painful film. Just...well, if you see it on AmazonPrime, it’s best to know what you’re getting into. So back to our marriage problems:, Nate can decide to perceive Paige as jealous or as needing affirmation. Paige can decide to see Nate as an artist or as self-centered.


But let’s get to the third character: Griffin, this odd guy next door who -- for all we know may or may not exist. Griffin is the kind of neighbor who asks the kind of deep questions folks in indie films ask. Thing is: he kinda knows an awful lot about Nate, who seems to be the only one who sees him. Is Griffin an angel? Is he God? I don’t think he’s God or even an alien. Griffin is the kind of character who can either make or break an indie film because, heck, he gives us a sermony voiceover at the end.


The ending is an open-ending. We don’t see any human bodies so it’s possible our lovers still exist and are alive on another planet somewhere. Heck, they might have been raptured! Thing is though: the earth doesn’t seem destroyed, just kinda ya know… emptied. And if it is emptied, or --heck-- if our main characters are dead...at least they are together and committed to being willing to understand each other.


I remember the days when alien invasion movies ended with humans triumphing over their reptilian exo-skeletoned baddies. Heck, I remember the days when the earth survived all kinds of disasters. Not so, now. It has often been said that if we Earthers were to be challenged by a larger looming evil --heck, if we Americans were all challenged by some external evil-- we would all finally join together. Uhm, I’m not sure of that. Human willfulness and selfishness are both pretty strong. So in the end, our main characters come to terms with their lives and with the changes to their world. Is that a good thing? And if so, how? Is harmony between humans, come what may, all that matters?




Zootopia
Producers: Monica Lago-Kaytis, John Lasseter, Brad Simonson, Clark Spencer; Directors and Writers: Byron Howard, Jared Bush, Rich Moore; Walt Disney Studios, Walt Disney Animation 2016


Now, perhaps it’s me. But I find myself thinking there is something else to Zootopia other than the much-praised meta-animated discussion of racism. And don’t get me wrong! I do love the film’s insights into multiculturalism and racial dynamics in a cosmopolitan world. And hey! It’s a good mystery and great animation! Some of the racial subtexts were so good I actually had to google the writers to see if any of them were Black. Example: As a Black woman, I’ve had white folks --notably-- my white mother-in-law reach out to touch my afro. And the notion that a government official could make a drug from a flower and circulate it to the “predatory” classes was not lost on my ultra-conspiratorial Jamaican mind. And heck, I almost cried twice when watching Zootopia,  although I suspect that both racists and non-racists could feel the movie is speaking to them.


The first time I almost wept copious tears was of a scene uniquely connected to minorities; the other was a scene that a more generalized audience would understand. In the first scene, an incident is recounted of a little boy who was not allowed to belong because he was not the right uh…okay let’s call it ”race.” The second scene harkened to the kind of heartfelt sentimentality that is everywhere during the Christmas Season, Martin Luther King Day, or even the Special Olympics: belief in possibilities, hope in humanity and ourselves, and loving trust in our neighbors. So yes, I liked this movie a lot.


But yeah, that other thing. The other human element, a subtext which a more homogenous nation might more readily see. Forgetting racial matters, the movie is also an examination of the emotional equivalence of predatoriness and the emotional similitude of being a prey. In Alienated, the viewer is shown two equals involved in a subtle war against each other. Culturally, a marriage is an alliance and a balance of emotional power; there should be neither prey nor predator in the relationship. (Of course predation --or assumptions of predation-- happens a lot in some marriage...and Alienated is an examination of the battle humans engage in when they believe they are being preyed upon.)


But in the “real” world, there are no fast rules on how to discern predatory humans, preys, or wolves in sheep’s clothing. We humans often take on allies -- in religious systems, in social groups, in social status-- on the assumption that those who are like us are probably not going to destroy us. In addition to that, we learn to discern false flags, to intuit warning signals, to decipher behavioral patterns that hint at whether we are dealing with someone we can harm, someone who can harm us, someone who will defend herself if attacked, someone who will scurry away like a bunny. I remember reading about a psychological study which examined why certain types of people usually end up repeatedly abused. They send out signals that potential attackers hone in on: phermones, if you will. Other folks, with kinder or more enlightened or introspective hearts, might also sniff out the weaknesses of their fellow humans. But these kinder, enlightened, introspective hearts never attack. They are either able to spiritually check themselves, or identify with the possible prey.


In Zootopia, Judy Hops still has the instinct to fear those who may be destructive to her. From biological instinct and from past experiences, she is predisposed to distrusting Nick who is a fox. Heck, she carries around a spray just in case she meets an unevolved fox. Thus she is aware that she has been prey and might be prey but she is not willing to be ruled by her past experiences. Nick, on the other hand, has experienced being prey. One would not think a fox could be deceived but alas as a child he was. As a lover of the poet William Blake, I will just say that Nick too went from “Songs of Innocence” to “Songs of Experience” And now, he -- like Judy-- are on their way to singing “Songs of Regained Innocence.”  


In Zootopia, biology is believed to be the marker that signals the possibility of predation. A lion’s biology would make it a predator, a bunny’s or a sheep’s biology would make it a prey. But since the animals of Zootopia have evolved past mere biological urges, all desire for predation has changed. Oh there are still power structures, scheming, underhandedness, etc. But there is no predation. Let’s digress and consider that for a moment. Not from an animal perspective but from humanity’s. Will cruel humans ever evolve out of the need to be cruel to weaker humans?


There is a scene where Judy chases a criminal through Little Rodentia, a town populated by tiny rodents. Our bunny cop, who has been pretty much among the tiniest beings in Zootopia’s capital city now has power to harm. However, she does not harm. She is quite aware of her power to accidentally step on those who are weaker or smaller than she is. In fact, the viewer also sees that Nick -- a predator-- is also aware of the little folks below him. Later, when we meet a big gangster, Mr Big, we discover that predation has nothing to do with size at all. Small, puny, people can be predatory too.     


This leads the viewer to begin to understand that preys can go against their biological programming and suddenly behave like predators. (Not gonna get into the whole nurture versus nature debate here.) So, it is no surprise to us when we see that one prey has been put-upon for so long that patience becomes anger, the need to control, and the active desire for vengeance.  I found myself wondering about the human “real world” counterpart of this situation. Do weak, put-upon people suddenly lose it? Why yes, they do!


Considering how volatile the world has been about racial matters lately, I’m not sure how many reviewers will wish to examine this aspect of the film. After all, racism is of national import right now. Being kinder and gentler to each other is kinda on the back-burner. Besides, reviewers, as a group, tend to be like other humans: there are some who are so emotionally strong -- or who have been biologically, financially, and racially linked to power-- that they may not see this little corner of the box. But, I’m hoping in those reviewers out there who understand what being prey is. They might see this subtext quite easily. And maybe their pens will be their swords and they can root for a film that basically tells us all to be excellent to each other.


Happy Creativity, all.




Saturday, February 11, 2017

2017 Oscar Nominated Shorts -- Documentary

4.1 Miles
 
This joint US-Greece short shows the efforts to save refugees coming in by boat from the Middle East via Turkey. I was on the verge of tears watching this. The film is effective in showing how complex the whole humanitarian crisis is. Weeping children, many of them orphans, caring but wary Greeks who feel their island is being overwhelmed, especially because there is no infrastructure on the island to take care of sick, homeless refugees. A very sad but important watch. I suspect that even people who are hateful toward Moslems would be touched.   
 
 
Extremis
I think I needed a trigger alert for this documentary. The focus of this story is on people in ICU in Kansas who are not going to recover from their illnesses. These people (if they are able, or if their families are willing) are given the choice of living or dying. Sometimes living implies being in a vegetative state until the body gives out. It's definitely a study about the ethics of medicine. This is a very, very, hard watch.  
 
 
Joe’s Violin

This is very touching. After a NYC radio station starts a musical donation drive, many people donated their instruments. This story is focused on a holocaust survivor who is giving up his beloved violin. Music meant a lot to him before the war, while he was in the displaced person's camp in Siberia, and after. He donates the violin to a young girl and they become friends. This girl also has endure some suffering of her own.  This is a very inspiring documentary. I was weepy throughout.
 
The White Helmets
 
Among the bombed-out houses and shelters in Syria are a group of people called the White Helmets who go through the rubble to find survivors and bodies.  It's another hard watch. It's just very difficult seeing all that suffering, but it's inspiring to see how brave these first-responders are. This is yet another film that those who dislike refugees should see.
  
 
Watani: My Homeland
 
 This depicts the life of a refugee Syrian family as they try start a new life in Germany. It's hopeful but felt slightly like propaganda. Unlike the previous refugee films where we are in the middle of a distressing situation, this film has time for reflection and even a bit of a happy ending. The conversations tend to be the kind of talk one hears when one is aware that others are watching and that one needs to say certain appropriate things. Perhaps because of this and because of the slickness of the finished production, everything recalled in tranquility, the film feels like any old documentary one might find on a news program.

What Should Win: Joe's Violin or 4.1 Miles.
 
 
In Theaters February 8th and On Demand February 21st
 
For a full list of theaters the short films are playing in, visit:
 
For information on how to watch On Demand, visit:

Watch the official trailer:

 
 
 

2017 Oscar Nominated Shorts -- Animation


Blind Vaysha
 
The plot of this story is simple. A girl, Vaysha, is born with one eye that sees only the past and another eye that sees only the beautiful. Although the village women try to help her, she never sees the present. This modern fairytale from Canada merges the philosophical and the fantastical, which is what the best fairytales always do. Watching the artwork is like watching a living ancient etching. An animated film that will cause much discussion among filmgoers of any age. This should win if the Academy members decide to go for a deep story.
 
Borrowed Time

In this US short, a son recounts the tragic events that led to his father's death. A tragedy which he caused but was not responsible for and which has haunted him since that day. The cinematography  is breath-taking. The script is crisp, powerful, and heart-rending despite the sparse dialog. A lot of emotion and beauty in this 6-minute film.  Definitely not for kids. 
 
Pear Cider and Cigarettes
 
 This joint Canadian and UK noir has spectacular linear art, very reminscent of comic books. The story is excellent, the narration world-weary. The entire thing is stylish. But it bored me. Perhaps I'm burned out on good-for-nothing self-destructive types, but after a while I didn't care enough about the antihero and I kept wondering why such great art was being wasted on such a character. Perhaps it's the literature major in me but I've just seen too many stories about loser/users to care. This story added nothing new to similar stories and the backstory of ant-hero's life didn't give the viewer any reason to care about or understand him. So, while his friend the narrator was well-acted and worn down, the story seemed as inevitable and predictable as the anti-hero's path towards death.   
 
Pearl

This American short about growing up, bonding, and paternal love is very sweet but it says nothing new. In it, a young girl realizes how much her father has influenced her. The color palate of the film is very painterly, giving the viewer a rhapsodic pastel rush of fleeting, nostalgic, images.

Piper

 This is a Pixar joint and it is utterly adorable. I had a big grin on my face. It's cute, hopeful, joyful, lovely...and it has a cute little baby bird. Yes, the cuteness factor is off the charts. Academy members who like cuteness should love this.

What Should Win: Blind Vaysha but I wouldn't mind if Borrowed Time or Piper won.
 
 
 

Friday, February 10, 2017

2017 Oscar Nominated Shorts -- Live Action


Ennemis Intérieurs (Enemies Within)
 
Ennemis Interieurs is a story that takes place for the most part in one setting: an official's office. But that particular setting resonates in its universality and specificity. Most people, in most places have been in this type of setting. Who has not had to meet a bureaucrat at some government office? But the setting is also specific and immigrants, religious and ethnic minorities, will feel the resonance in their own way. 
 
The basic plot is this: An immigrant who has lived in France most of his life has decided to become a citizen. He is interviewed by an official who seems at first to be more a gatekeeper or police agent than a welcoming immigration office. 
 
This is one of the most harrowing short-shorts I've seen in a while. Even more harrowing than the many horror shorts I've seen. And the reason it's such a hard watch and such a painful slow burn is not because of the inherent creepiness that occurs when one sees someone being interrogated in a tiny room by a cold meticulous official bent on tripping one up. It's because one finds one's self getting angrier and angrier as the cruelty becomes more pointed and the trap becomes more inescapable.  It's been ages since a film villain has made me so angry. Most villains in movies are cool and we filmgoers generally admire their sang-froid and cold-heartedness. But the citizenship inspector is so reminiscent of that powerful real-world prejudiced villainous official who is hell-bent on destruction.  In this character, we see how pernicious, subtle, and vicious the prejudices of the powerful are. Highly recommended.   
 
 
La Femme et le TGV (The Woman and the TGV)

A woman whose life is passing her by is holding on to the past --its elegance, its proprieties, its routine. Part of her daily routine is waving out the window at a passing train -- the TGV. She has not greeted the new things of life -- things such as the internet, or people like the playful young guy who dared to park her car in front of her bakery. But then, one day, a letter arrives and it is from someone on the train. He has seen her waving everyday and he writes to thank her that he values that very human action. She answers that it is a habit she formed with her son in the old days. However, this new interaction with this unseen letter-writer becomes the catalyst which causes her to grow out of her old ways. 

I liked this film a lot. I can't say it is anything super-special, so I'm somewhat surprised that it is nominated as a short. After all, there are countless movies and shorts about people encountering something, event, or action that causes some life-changing momentum to be set in place. Perhaps I'm missing something about the film that makes me unable to see it's greatness. Perhaps it has national or cultural echoes --the death of small-town France, for instance. But I won't hold its simplicity against it. It is a sweet little short with a solid story and good cinematography.
 
 
Silent Nights

Every once in a while one comes upon a movie where one has a disconnect with the filmmakers. For me, this was such a movie. The story is about a young woman in Denmark who is working in a homeless shelter for poor legal and undocumented immigrants. She encounters a homeless man from Ghana and falls in love with him.  Because of this encounter, the man leaves Denmark with lots of money and the woman is left alone happily fulfilled with his child. Perhaps the blurb is to blame, which reads as: "The couple builds a life together, but a devastating secret from Kwame's past may undermine their happiness." SPOILER (which is not really a spoiler): The Ghanaian man is married with children.

There are countless reasons why this movie annoyed me. The primary one, however, is that the music cues us to like the Ghanaian. Musical cues rarely work when a story is so facile. The writer in me wants sentiment --especially the sentiment of pity-- to be earned. In the end, the story comes off as a tale about a naïve loveless White girl who is taken advantage of by a Black man. Which is fine. But this is not what the filmmakers intended. The depiction of the immigrant is patronizing, his adultery is glossed over and repaid by monetary gains. The girl comes off as a dupe, and the film as self-congratulatory and simplistic. For me the story should have been more subtle and more morally complicated. For instance, is it possible for a poor man to love a woman who is giving him financial help and who ends up providing him with sex and a place to stay? A story like this --told in times like this-- should leave the viewer feeling troubled and perhaps confused.  
 
Sing (Mindenki)

This Hungarian short is utterly a-political, yet profoundly political. Unlike the failure Silent Nights and the pointed and devastating Enemies Within, Sing shows in a small setting -- a primary school-- that the political is often quite personal and that communal power (however small) can overcome evil....if only on a small scale. The story concerns a school choir, the choir mistress, and an upcoming contest which the choir mistress desperately wishes to win.  The choir mistress is not below using cruelty to get her way. What I loved primarily about this film was its kindness, its unobtrusive but powerful subtext, and its efficient storytelling. It may not be as devastatingly powerful as Enemies Within but it says a lot about how power could be challenged. I highly recommend this little short.
 
 
Timecode

This short from Spain manages to be primarily about dance. I wouldn't necessarily call it a dance film, however. The dancing is interwoven like beads on a very thin plot string. But it works so well. The main characters are two guards who never speak to each other -- at least their communication is not verbal. They pass each other like ships in the night; dancing ships. The only verbal communication between them are the camera timecodes they exchange, timecodes which give each other clues to when and where their dance communication takes place. A good short, and like any good dance flick, the culmination of the story and the dance work perfectly together.
 

Thursday, February 09, 2017

review: The Great Good Thing by Andrew Klavan

The Great Good Thing: A Secular Jew Comes to Faith in Christ
by Andrew Klavan
  • Hardcover: 304 pages
  • Publisher: Thomas Nelson (September 20, 2016)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 071801734X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0718017347
I really like this book. Usually I fear reading conversion stories that are published by large Christian companies. Often, they are ghost-written by a Christian ghost-writer and feels very cookie-cutter by-the-book. Often those conversion stories don't feel quite literary. And no, I'm not into literary memoirs, but there is something to be said for actually seeing the personality of the writer and knowing one is reading words that are chosen by the book's subject instead of words chosen or written by a ghostwriter. But hey, that's just me. The writer in me can spot sameness in any book and apparently, there's a Christian style of non-fiction/memoir writing.

Anyway, moving on.

Another thing that's good about this book is that feels as if it was written by an excellent writer. There is a self-searching and an honesty that is apparent in this spiritual memoir. The book is ruminative and revelatory and much care is taken to show the inner workings of the memoirist. He talks about having to push past his knowledge that his background might have set him up to reject his faith in order to fit into White Christian Culture. Because the writer of this book loves books, the memoir has many literary references as well as many dissections of emotional, psychological, and spiritual challenges on the way to his conversion.  And he's very honest about his challenges, giving -- so to speak-- "a knife to any reader who might wish to stab him with" some supposed 'reason' for his conversion.  Most Christian non-fiction --in my experience-- just isn't that honest. And that's what I liked about this memoir.

One of the challenges he mentions was when he had that moment, the false epiphany of "No God." It reminded of what happened to William James, Henry James' Brother. If I recall, James had been walking through life when suddenly it occurred to him that God did not exist. It was such a sudden realization that it freed him, supposedly. Except that Klavan couldn't rest in that sudden (false) realization that God didn't exist. He pushed past it.

The book is very readable, insightful, and a great read. Highly recommended. I received this book free from the publisher in exchange for a fair and honest review.




 

Sunday, January 29, 2017

The Fan: A Boy Goes on a Journey

THE FAN -- So...this happened: A Boy Goes on a Journey
By Carole McDonnell

Hello, all:


One of the chief joys of journeys is the joy of simply zoning out from one’s own mind and entering into the swiftly (or slowly) moving passing present. The joy of being in the happening, especially if the happening is new, emotionally involving, and promises a fulfilling destination. Here now are the latest fan journeys from the Fan, a collection of squees definitely come from a fan girl’s heart.


Train to Busan, Korean, 2016, horror-thriller.  Directed by Yeon Sang-ho, Produced by Lee Dong-ha, Written by Park Joo-suk; Starring Gong Yoo, Ma Dong-seok running time: 2 hours.


The first thing you oughta know is that Korean films and TV shows are very spiritual. Even films that are revenge thrillers are bound to have a redemption arc or two. You can’t escape it. The second thing you ought to know is that this is a film about a zombie outbreak on a bullet train. A sudden zombie outbreak. I say this because your typical American film about an outbreak of zombieism tends to concern itself with the day after. In Train to Busan, the survivors are suddenly overwhelmed by sudden disaster. Maybe it’s the effect of living in the fearful shadow of North Korea but the film gives off a great siege mentality, sudden psychic trauma vibe.


So, our story begins with Fund Manager, Seok Woo who pretty much represents greed and selfishness. Korean films, of late have been way concerned with greed and greediness. Seok Woo has plans for himself and his daughter Su-An. They end up on a train with Sang-hwa and his wife Sung-kyung, who is pregnant, two older women who are sisters, a rich guy, a high school baseball team, two lovers, and a mysterious homeless man. These folks all represent different levels and permutations of selfishness, altruism, and self-sacrifice. And then, the zombie rage and neck-biting begins.


And the munchies have not only affected zombies on the train, but it’s all over. Why? You may ask. Well, pay attention to the first ten or so minutes and you’ll get an idea of why things in Seoul and the rest of Korea have come to such a pass. (I can’t say anymore; I only write spoilers when there is absolutely no chance you’ll be watching a film.) So..upshot? The train can’t just stop anywhere. Coz, ya know: zombie roamers, zombie rioting. And right now the only place that seems safe is Busan, the other big city in Korea. (Oh yes, something else about Busan that we Korean dramaphiles know: Busan is a bit like the anti-Seoul..and often equated with country folks and the working class but also with gangsters. So much so that gangsters from all over Korea routinely train themselves to speak in a Busan accent. But who is the real lowlife? The sophisticated Seoulite or the working class guy? Who is the better person? And who is the useless person? Does money truly make the man?


Of course part of the fun of a horror movie is seeing the different kinds of kills and wondering if your favorite characters will make it. I won’t tell you who all makes it to the end, but I’ll warn you that since this is a Korean movie and Korean directors love devastating viewers, it’s best you don’t get too attached to most of our main characters. Just saying: Korean women seem to like crying. So, yeah, there’s that.


Let me tell you, Dear Reader and Cinema-phile, this is a great two-hour thrill-ride popcorn flick. (There’s an animated sequel called Seoul Survivors which I didn’t get a chance to watch which is probably just as much fun...and more so because, yeah...animation. Animated bodies in horror can do mega-more interesting stuff. Yeah, I really should find that film and watch it as well.)


We have redemption arc, we have guilt, we have bromance, we have moral and immoral decisions, bonds broken and made, we have unexpected deaths (okay, they’re only unexpected if you don’t know Korean thrillers, and the last two minutes of the film really had me wondering if nihilism or optimism would triumph. I won’t tell you what wins.) There are two villains, one more overtly villainous than the other. Incredibly nasty-villain comes to an appropriately nasty ending, and not-so-overtly-nasty villain has his moment of redemption. And yes, we have zombies on a train.


What I liked about this flick -- other than being able to see a couple of my fave actors in Korea’s first zombie flick-- is the simple but great worldbuilding. We need to understand only a couple of facts about zombie life and our main characters. Once the audience understands how your typical zombie behaves under certain situations and who is selfish and altruistic, we’re off and running. And yes...I do mean “running.” Because not only are the survivors running but this is one extremely fast-paced flick. Highly recommended.


Kubo and the Two Strings -- Written by Marc Haimes and Chris Butler. Directed by Travis Knight. Produced by Laika Studios, 102 minutes, United States, August 2016


Kubo and the Two Strings is a stop-action animation film with one of the most engaging characters I’ve seen in a while. To begin with, he is a very loving and caring child….with one eye. What a sweetie! I can’t remember the last time I saw a film about a loving, caring, little boy. I know this might seem like a strange reason to love a movie but think of it...we don’t see care-giving little boys in films nowadays where caregiving is the child’s major role. And we certainly don’t see it in animated films. Of course the typical hero of old is often selfless, filial, and noble, but he’s usually busy on his hero’s journey; his caring qualities is part of his subtext and only arise when he needs those weaker than himself.


But not Kubo. Kubo’s sole, selfless, purpose in life is to care for his mother -- a mother who is not entirely emotionally-present….unlike the totally absent-but-perfectly-healthy doting moms in the typical fairytale or Disney films.  That alone makes Kubo unique. He’s a sweet kid and we simply love being with him on his journey. And what a sweet, lovely, magical journey it is! This is a beautiful, fanciful story. And “fanciful” is always fun.


The Poet Emily Dickinson wrote, “A poem should not mean, but be.” Sometimes being and mere experience are all that’s needed; meaning can be unnecessary --or worse-- an intrusion. Kubo and the Two Strings is a storytelling experience about stories. Or maybe it’s about journeys. Or maybe it’s about memories. But, wonderful little film that it is, it would probably have excelled to awesomeness if the screenwriter had not tried to wrestle meaning into it. I have no problem with meaning. Let me be clear about that. What I have a problem with is the sudden infiltration of an attempt at meaning which feels tacked on, awkward, preachy, and over-reaching. An example: some night-time dreams are clear, others are utterly incomprehensible yet they still manage to touch the deepest part of the dreamer’s soul and make the dreamer feel as if she has touched the numinous. Kubo’s beauty comes from its characters, its matter-of-fact fantasy, its mundane otherworldliness, and its depiction of emotions as powerful as love and grief.  So, yeah, I kinda wish the storyteller had not felt the need to tie so much of his story into a neat little bow.  I suppose the “creative powers that were” felt that a good children’s story should have its meaning stated explicitly. I’m not sure, though, that meaning --explicitly stated or otherwise-- is all that necessary. Kids tend to be more interested in characters...and their journeys..than they are in the meaning. One of my favorite stories, The Day Boy and the Night Girl by George MacDonald, is downright inscrutable. But it haunts me still….But “still” Kubo is haunting in its own way. Just not as haunting as it should be.



Now, We’re Alive (Et Maintenant, nous sommes en vie)  2014, French, Thibault Arbre (Writer, Director, Producer).  Giles Daoust, Producer. Amazon Prime.


I happened upon this movie either by sheer luck or by trained intuition. Give me a film synopsis, and I can pretty much tell (most of the time) what I’m in for. Well, imagine my surprise when I found myself being flummoxed as I watched this little French spec-fic indie. Like all my fave films, it’s a slow burn and folks will either love it or hate it. I loved it. Why? You may ask.


Because it’s a great example of a writer taking a speculative premise and running through its various ramifications. When the story begins, we are presented with Tom. Tom is twenty-five and as tradition dictates, he must find his wife. Or, rather, the voice of his soul. This is done by being blindfolded and placed in a room and listening to women (also born on the same day he was, fifteen years ago) speak. The voice of his soul, his true wife, will captivate him and he will know who he is to marry. He will, after that, go in search for her.


So, Tom does all this. He even has visions of the woman’s face. But, woe betide, he cannot find her and when a woman presents herself as the voice he has heard, he simply does not connect with her. This is seriously bad, culturally and familially speaking. An affront to sensible people, an offense to his father and to the girl’s family. But alas, Tom has to soldier on.


But he doesn’t necessarily do that. He becomes more and more attached to the vision of the woman --named Jeanne, perhaps-- whom he knows is the true voice of his soul. All the while, he ignores, sweet patient Lea. Question is: Is Jeanne a figment of his imagination? Is she some inner aspect of Lea? Is the tradition right or wrong? Should Tom just give up on his ideal and accept the woman in his bed? Is there such a thing as the perfect true love...or not?


I loved this movie. Why? Because Tom is so obsessive and so sure and I love an obsessed hero who believes in that one personal truth that no one else believes.


41, Director Glenn Triggs, Writer: Glenn Triggs, Science fiction, UK, 2012


So, there I was trying to resist my love of time travel movies. (For your benefit, Dear Reader.)  Then this film caught my attention. Nay, I dare say it jumped out at me. From my youtube screen. Let me add that for some strange cosmic reason there are a heck of a lot of movies out there with the title 41. So if you go searching for this flick, look for the indie-looking one made in 2012.


If you like indie scifi films, this might be up your alley as well. I suppose I should say --off-handedly-- that it is a bit like Primer. Bur seriously, what indie time travel film isn’t like Primer?  


Our story begins with Hayden in his philosophy class listening to the lecture ask those deep questions hip philosophy teachers always ask at the beginning of indie flicks. Our premise subtly (or not so subtly) placed before us, we next see Hayden meeting himself. He warns himself not to go to a certain motel and not to go to room 41. But, do I even need to say that he ends up there? Of course not. People never heed the advice given to them by their time-travelling selves. Turns out there is a hole in the floor of a certain hotel room which leads to “the day before.” The next thing we know, Hayden’s ex-girlfriend --whom he bumped into at the motel he wasn’t supposed to go to-- ends up dead. Problematical. One: because the cops blame him for it. And two: because try as he might to prevent the death, his former girlfriend always ends up dead and he ends up with various versions of himself. What to do? What to do?


Ya know...ya know...this was a fun movie. Hayden’s repeated attempts to repair yesterday of course lead him to the answer to the life-question posed by hip-trendy professor. But it’s not the life question that mattered for me, it was the journey and the people Hayden met along the way.


Monday, November 28, 2016

Review: Soframiz: Vibrant Middle Eastern Recipes from Sofra Bakery and Cafe

Soframiz: Vibrant Middle Eastern Recipes from Sofra Bakery and Cafe
by Ana Sofrun and Maura Kilpatrick
                                                                                                                                                                                

  • Hardcover: 264 pages
  • Publisher: Ten Speed Press (October 11, 2016)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1607749181
  • ISBN-13: 978-1607749189
Wow! What a great tempting book! Generally, I don't like cookbooks created by chefs who are giving readers their formerly secret recipes. For one, cookbooks made by chefs tend to be a bit pretentious and oriented toward the foodie types. For two, I generally hate food fusion...which a lot of these chefs do for upscale customers. For three, the books are often created to advertise the chef and his/her restaurant.

Well, imagine my surprise! This book has none of those drawbacks! Well, some of the dishes definitely look westernized but not to the smug foodie fusion extreme. I'm wondering if I should keep it -- because I may just try making (or looking for) everything in this book-- and I can't do that because I'm not really supposed to eat gluten.  

The recipes are of foods that are found in the Middle East. Think, Yemen, Greece, Israel, Iran, Morocco, and Turkey.

The chapters and categories are:
Breakfast
Meze
Flatbreads
Savory Pies
Cookies and Confections
Specialty Pastries, cakes, and desserts,
Beverages,
Pantry (which includes recipes for several basic Middle Eastern spices)
Essential ingredients
Friends and Resources
About the Authors
Acknowledgments
Index

The book is primarily about pastries, so there aren't a lot of meat recipes. But those that are present look so good! Meat, veggies, chocolate, dairy, nuts, seeds, fruits, flowers, squashes, and beans joined with different kinds of doughs to form breakfast, snacks/appetizers (or mezes) desserts, and larger meals. Then there are the beverages --namely three teas, one lemonade, and one hot chocolate!

Most of the ingredients are available in grocery stores but a few might only be found in your local middle eastern stores or via Amazon. Generally, the authors don't tell the cookbook user how nd what to substitute for the missing ingredient.

 The recipes are clearly stated and the pictures are temptingly beautiful. Most of these recipes are unknown to me. So don't expect to find recipes for stuffed grape leaves or tabbouleh. Yeah, I kinda wish they had included some of the foods we know...but you know...the real versions of them. But its a great book, nevertheless. If you're a baker, and you want to experiment with new kinds of pastry --the sweets and desserts in this book reminded me of Turkish candies-- definitely buy this book.  Or make it a present for the cook you know.

This book was sent to me free in exchange for a fair and honest review.

 

Blog Archive